🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, public demonstration has ceased to be a basic freedom. Rather, it has become a conditional permission that those in power allow or deny as they see fit. This constitutes the implication of new regulations that the current government is putting forward, which would dictate the timing and location demonstrations can occur, with potential prison sentences for those who defy these restrictions.

Gradual Weakening of Civil Liberties

Earlier administrations had already weakened this essential right: the former Conservative government had given law enforcement extensive new authorities, which global rights bodies had censured as "significant and unjustified restrictions" on democratic freedoms. Taken together, these incremental assaults on freedom have effectively eliminated the historically earned right to freedom of protest.

Exploiting Atrocity to Justify Crackdown

The latest restrictive measures are being defended by citing last week's terrible anti-Jewish assault on a British Islamic center. We can all agree on universal agreement that the security of British Jews must be safeguarded. However, employing this horrific incident as a pretext to suppress dissent is not only disconnected to that duty but distorts it.

"When you can't draw the line at mass killing, you probably cannot establish limits at democratic principles," observed a prominent American author, whose words that rings true for the present administration.

Historical Context of Protest

Consider Britain's rich history of public demonstration and activism against racial discrimination and authoritarianism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to postwar Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s demonstrations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were labeled as radicals in their era, even while they were fighting for the freedoms of marginalized groups.

Present Situation

In today's complicated landscape, here's what's truly happening: The Israeli government – a sovereign nation – is committing what United Nations investigations have characterized as genocide. Its military actions have prompted the International Criminal Court to issue legal indictments against Israel's prime minister and his former defense minister.

Western public opinion has shifted dramatically against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a substantial majority of the public think Israel has likely committed international law violations. Most people would support a complete ban on weapons exports to the state, and approve the detention of the Israeli leader.

Suppressing Opposition

Having essentially lost the argument, pro-Israel advocates are now seizing on a despicable antisemitic crime to try to suppress a popular campaign against a moral catastrophe. The British government seems involved in this attempt. Ministers have not enacted extensive restrictions on Israel and have permitted weapon shipments to proceed.

People who are demonstrating against the erasure of Gaza have been characterized as hateful extremists. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a more extensive suppression on these protesters until now: extremely few protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement little justification to take action.

Dangerous Conflation

Merging Jewish identity with the policies of the Israeli state is not only manipulative but also harmful. The official definition of anti-Jewish prejudice, accepted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been appropriately challenged for potentially stifling legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its central illustrations: that "holding Jewish people collectively responsible for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've arrived at a situation where law enforcement can suggest that protests criticizing Israel's actions should be canceled because they might "inadvertently or intentionally" endorse antisemitism. Similarly, government officials have declared that recognition of Palestine as a nation has made organizations "implicated" in alleged abuse experienced by British Jews.

Double Standards

On the same day as the religious center assault, the Israel's army killed dozens of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – increasing the horrific toll from two years of daily atrocities that have taken many thousands of lives. British political leaders and media outlets have barely concealed the minimal importance they attach to Palestinian life. This represents one of the most brazen demonstrations of racism in our time.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already crossed a dangerous threshold by banning Palestine Action, a peaceful, human rights-focused activist collective. Multiple thousands of British protesters have been detained, mostly for holding placards against genocide and supporting the banned organization. Many of those detained are elderly citizens; including a retired priest and the child of a Holocaust survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's easy to see where this trajectory leads. In the United States, government officials helped demonize demonstrations supporting Palestine: a ex-political leader implied that some were "linked with" foreign governments, while the current president characterized such demonstrations as antisemitic. In taking these actions, they helped legitimize the authoritarian crackdown on such protests – and on free speech in general.

Looking Ahead

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be granted extensive authority to control opposition. What might a new administration do with this restrictive framework? Our forebears fought, suffered and died to establish our liberties. We may eventually rue how easily we permitted them to be eroded.